13 thoughts on “Don’t Underestimate The Invisible Hand!!

  1. A first-rate piece! Baked into many of the recently implemented mask edicts is the false assumption that the market will not correct those business proprietors who choose to deviate from or ignore COVID health guidelines. The market has clearly created an incentive for businesses to maintain sanitary conditions in their stores, however this fact has been profoundly neglected by media pundits and politicians who seem to favor coercive measures over self-governance and freedom.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Absolutely! Too few people recognize that the self-correcting nature of the market can provide a more efficient solution.

      Unfortunately, due to state and local governments getting involved in the matter, it has become a politicized issue. It should be a matter of personal choice. The implied reciprocity of that right also enables homeowners and store owners to require visitors or patrons to wear masks. However, this also allows them to not require them to wear masks.

      The right to do engage in behavior also secures the right to abstain from it. A principle that many atheists need to acknowledge. The right of free-worship also implies the ability to abstain from religious practices (Just using this one as an example).

      Liked by 1 person

        1. 1.) Thank you for your kind word regarding my essay. I hope to publish more in the near future. I just need the right inspiration for another brief and punchy article.

          2.) I just finished reading the abstract. Very interesting. Sounds like polycentricity at it’s finest. I will read the full article in the near future and incorporate it in my water-rights research.

          I was taking a bit of a hiatus as try to regroup and thoroughly flesh out the issue.

          Liked by 1 person

        2. That was a really good paper. It varies the role of trade relations in avoiding conflict.

          Oddly enough the authors’ point regarding the distribution of costs of violent conflict could also be used for privatizing defense.

          The Acadians settlers did not receive much (or any)support from the mother country. Making it much more costly to engage in armed conflicts. Making me wonder if the production of defense, security, and surveillance services was not provided by the state if there would be less instances of wars.

          Military action funded by tax dollars creates the illusion of “free” defense services. If the costs were concentrated in monthly defense premiums or quarterly invoices, I believe we all be much more cautious about engaging in armed conflicts.

          Liked by 1 person

        3. If my understanding of that concept is correct I don’t see why not. Even we are talking about contributing resources or money to a defense club, association, neighborhood militia, the HOA armed auxiliary force ( a value-add service provide through HOA dues), etc. I would surmise the moment your contribution to such services is salient your incentive structure has changed,

          If it is barrier the mass composite of taxes collected. An individual is more apt to believe such services are free.

          Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.